#数据/训练
AI at Meta@AIatMetaAI 评分5050
Microsoft ResearchAI 评分5858 微软研究院提出 StudentSim:用学生模拟器为 AI 辅导系统提供反馈
微软研究院发布研究系统 StudentSim,用公开的去标识化学习记录训练个性化 AI 学生模拟器,在真实学习者测试之前评估和改进 AI 辅导系统。该系统采用两阶段训练,先在同学科多学生记录上学习共性,再针对单个学生适配,并配套提出覆盖国际象棋、第二语言英语写作和数学的评测协议 StudentSimEval。
Qwen@Alibaba_QwenAI 评分4848千问发布 QwenGyre,将弹性强化学习引入超长时程(XLong)智能体训练,核心设计包括 Elastic Scheduler 与 Trajectory Processor。
Aran Komatsuzaki@arankomatsuzakiAI 评分4545
OpenAI@OpenAI精选AI 评分7272推荐理由:OpenAI 公开内部前沿模型产出的数学结果,并说明发布方式参考了外部顾问组的建议。
Google AI@GoogleAIAI 评分5858Google AI 介绍 AI 研究实验室 Living Models 将 Gemma 4 与植物 DNA 专用模型 BOTANIC-1 组合,用于快速定位影响作物性状的基因突变。
Hugging Face@huggingface精选AI 评分7878Hugging Face 团队发布多 harness RL 训练指南,指出同一模型在相同权重下,在一个 agent harness 中得分 62%,在另一个中仅 33%。
推荐理由:同一模型在不同 agent harness 下得分相差近一倍,这篇开源研究给出了不改 harness 的多环境 RL 训练方法。
Microsoft ResearchAI 评分3838 微软研究院用机器学习预测电网空间天气风险
微软研究院实习生构建的机器学习流水线可为美国本土66,935座变电站生成30-60分钟前的空间天气风险预报,评估期内检出近80%的重大空间天气事件。系统结合AE与Dst指数预报、纬度、地质电导率及电网数据,Dst预测在2020-2026年活动高峰时段有62.2%的小时优于Burton方程。
Google DeepMind精选AI 评分6666 Google DeepMind 推出 SynthID Bio,为 AI 生成的蛋白质加可验证水印
Google DeepMind 发布 SynthID Bio,把水印技术引入合成生物学,将不可感知的签名嵌入生物代码,在实验室测试中保持蛋白质生物功能不变。该方法针对序列微调氨基酸选择、针对 3D 结构调整原子坐标,并在 AlphaFold 3 扩散网络中微调部分权重,使预测坐标自带可检测签名。
推荐理由:Google DeepMind 把 SynthID 水印扩展到合成生物学,读者可了解其在蛋白质设计与结构预测中的嵌入方式及生物安全用途。
Microsoft Research精选AI 评分6262 微软研究院推出面向生物学复杂性的 AI 研究系统 Quine
微软研究院推出 Quine,一个由跨模态生物学世界模型和连接模型、科学工具、文献与研究者的交互框架组成的 AI 研究系统。该系统与 Broad Institute 合作用于胰腺导管腺癌研究,从数千个化合物中筛选并优先排序候选分子,湿实验显示排名最高的化合物产生了最大的经典态到基底态细胞状态转变,整个筛选到候选验证过程仅用一个周末。
推荐理由:微软研究院公开 Quine 的生物学世界模型与实验编排框架,并给出胰腺癌化合物筛选的湿实验验证结果。
Microsoft ResearchAI 评分2222 Microsoft Research Asia 新加坡实验室成立一周年:推进前沿 AI 研究与产学研合作
Microsoft Research Asia 新加坡实验室迎来成立一周年,这是微软在东南亚的首个研究实验室。该实验室围绕下一代 AI 模型与智能体系统、领域专用 AI、AI 原生研究实践、生态与人才培养四大方向展开工作,并在医疗健康领域与新加坡本地伙伴合作推进多模态医疗 AI 与自进化诊断智能体的落地。
Google AI@GoogleAIAI 评分2020哦,原来这就是我们绘制雄性果蝇全部 166,000 个神经元图谱的原因。来看看这项社区大规模协作成果,展示这些微小果蝇大脑究竟有多大能耐 🪰🧵
Hugging Face@huggingfaceAI 评分2020
Google AI@GoogleAI精选AI 评分6666Google 推出 AlphaGenome Atlas,一个面向基因组学发现的可交互平台,把 AlphaGenome 的预测扩展到人类基因组全部 90 亿个单字母变异,形成约 1PB 数据集。
推荐理由:原文交代了平台如何把 AlphaGenome 的预测扩展成 1PB 数据集,并给出零代码检索入口,便于读者判断它对基因研究流程的改变。
AI at Meta@AIatMeta精选AI 评分6868
推荐理由:Meta 公开 AIRA₃ 在 Kaggle 微调竞赛中的名次与参赛条件,可据此判断自主研究系统在模型能力改进上的位置。
Qwen@Alibaba_QwenAI 评分5050千问推出 E-Commerce Bench,用于评测长周期自主商业运营:智能体以 ¥100,000 启动资金经营网店 365 天,需处理选品、议价、定价、促销、库存与现金流。
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分3838 ABBEL:通过信念状态监督让 LLM 高效完成长程交互
伯克利 AI 研究团队提出 ABBEL 框架,将 LLM 的交互摘要建模为自然语言"信念状态"并对其内容单独监督。在协作编程基准 CollabBench 上,该方法把与全上下文模型的性能差距缩小约 50%,训练步数从 100 步降至 50 步,峰值上下文 token 数也明显低于全上下文设置。
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分5858引用Mira Murati@miramuratiThinking Machines Lab exists to empower humanity through advancing collaborative general intelligence. We're building multimodal AI that works with how you naturally interact with the world - through conversation, through sight, through the messy way we collaborate. We're excited that in the next couple months we’ll be able to share our first product, which will include a significant open source component and be useful for researchers and startups developing custom models. Soon, we’ll also share our best science to help the research community better understand frontier AI systems. To accelerate our progress, we’re happy to confirm that we’ve raised $2B led by a16z with participation from NVIDIA, Accel, ServiceNow, CISCO, AMD, Jane Street and more who share our mission. We’re always looking for extraordinary talent that learns by doing, turning research into useful things. We believe AI should serve as an extension of individual agency and, in the spirit of freedom, be distributed as widely and equitably as possible. We hope this vision resonates with those who share our commitment to advancing the field. If so, join us. https://thinkingmachines.paperform.co/
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分4242 智能免费之后怎么办?面向智能体、由智能体构建的数据系统
UC Berkeley 团队提出,推理成本已从 GPT-4 级约 $30/百万 token 降至不足 $1,部分厂商低于 $0.10,基准测试中推理价格每年下降 9x 至 900x、中位数约 50x。作者据此提出三类数据系统挑战:为智能体设计的数据系统、支撑智能体群体运行的数据系统、以及由智能体合成的数据系统。
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分2222协作式 AI 建立在交互性之上:机器与人,实时协作,覆盖每一种模态。解决这个问题需要社区的力量,加入我们。
引用Thinking Machines@thinkymachinesWe are offering grants of $100,000 + Tinker credits to researchers advancing the field of human-AI interactivity. Submit your proposals by June 19th! https://thinkingmachines.ai/news/interactivity-research-grants/
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分3636 自适应并行推理:高效推理扩展的下一个范式
伯克利 AI 研究团队综述并行推理进展,重点分析自适应并行推理——让模型自行决定何时分解并并行化子任务、开多少并发线程以及如何协调。现有方法如 self-consistency、Best-of-N、Tree of Thoughts、MCTS、ParaThinker、GroupThink 和 Hogwild! Inference 的并行结构多由外部设定,而非模型自主选择。
Berkeley AI ResearchAI 评分3838 Berkeley AI Research 提出 GRASP:面向世界模型长时程规划的梯度规划器
Berkeley AI Research 提出 GRASP,一种面向学习型世界模型的梯度规划器,通过将轨迹提升到虚拟状态实现跨时间并行优化、在状态迭代上直接注入随机性以促进探索,并重塑梯度让动作获得清晰信号。该方法针对长时程规划中梯度爆炸/消失、非贪心结构导致局部极小值以及高维视觉模型状态-输入梯度脆弱等问题,使基于梯度的长时程规划更稳健。
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6060引用Farza 🇵🇰🇺🇸@FarzaTVThis is Farzapedia. I had an LLM take 2,500 entries from my diary, Apple Notes, and some iMessage convos to create a personal Wikipedia for me. It made 400 detailed articles for my friends, my startups, research areas, and even my favorite animes and their impact on me complete with backlinks. But, this Wiki was not built for me! I built it for my agent! The structure of the wiki files and how it's all backlinked is very easily crawlable by any agent + makes it a truly useful knowledge base. I can spin up Claude Code on the wiki and starting at index.md (a catalog of all my articles) the agent does a really good job at drilling into the specific pages on my wiki it needs context on when I have a query. For example, when trying to cook up a new landing page I may ask: "I'm trying to design this landing page for a new idea I have. Please look into the images and films that inspired me recently and give me ideas for new copy and aesthetics". In my diary I kept track of everything from: learnings, people, inspo, interesting links, images. So the agent reads my wiki and pulls up my "Philosophy" articles from notes on a Studio Ghibli documentary, "Competitor" articles with YC companies whose landing pages I screenshotted, and pics of 1970s Beatles merch I saved years ago. And it delivers a great answer. I built a similar system to this a year ago with RAG but it was ass. A knowledge base that lets an agent find what it needs via a file system it actually understands just works better. The most magical thing now is as I add new things to my wiki (articles, images of inspo, meeting notes) the system will likely update 2-3 different articles where it feels that context belongs, or, just creates a new article. It's like this super genius librarian for your brain that's always filing stuff for your perfectly and also let's you easily query the knowledge for tasks useful to you (ex. design, product, writing, etc) and it never gets tired. I might spend next week productizing this, if that's of interest to you DM me + tell me your usecase!
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6262引用Andrej Karpathy@karpathyLLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathyAI 评分6060
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分4242作为我们对开放协作科学承诺的一部分,我们正通过资助计划扩大研究人员和讲师对 Tinker 的免费访问。
引用Thinking Machines@thinkymachinesToday we’re announcing research and teaching grants for Tinker: credits for scholars and students to fine-tune and experiment with open-weight LLMs. Read more and apply at: https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/tinker-research-and-teaching-grants/
Mira Murati@miramuratiAI 评分3636结合RL和SFT的优势,采用同策略蒸馏,这是一种有前景的方法,可用于训练小模型以提升领域表现和持续学习能力。
引用Thinking Machines@thinkymachinesOur latest post explores on-policy distillation, a training approach that unites the error-correcting relevance of RL with the reward density of SFT. When training it for math reasoning and as an internal chat assistant, we find that on-policy distillation can outperform other approaches for a fraction of the cost. https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/on-policy-distillation/