跳到正文
Rohan Paul· @rohanpaul_ai · X·· 3 小时前精选AI 评分72
AI 导读

Anthropic 训练 Claude 在每次回答后对对话做一次初步安全评估,这一机制称为 self-assessment,自 6 月启用以来已发现其他防护措施未能覆盖的滥用行为。

推荐理由

Anthropic 披露 Claude 自我评估机制的具体命中率与误报率,可据此判断这类安全检测的成本取舍。

正文 · 原文

Every time Claude answers, it now quietly asks itself whether it just helped someone cause harm, and that private verdict goes to Anthropic’s reviewers.

Anthropic’s most accurate misuse detector is a Claude Mythos Preview classifier that reads all its safety policies before every ruling, which makes it too expensive to run on every chat.

So Anthropic trained Claude to copy its judgments without the policies or the reasoning, and on Fable 5 traffic the copy matches 78% of the detector’s flags, rising to 94% for high-priority cases, at a 1% false-alarm rate.

引用Anthropic@AnthropicAI
We’ve trained Claude to flag potential misuse in conversations, a technique we call self-assessment. Right after it responds, Claude gives a preliminary safety assessment of the conversation. Since we began using self-assessment in June, it has surfaced misuse that our other safeguards weren’t designed to catch. Because Claude has already read the conversation, self-assessment is very efficient. And unlike classifiers, which target a discrete set of harms, it draws on Claude’s own judgment, so it gets more accurate as our models improve. Read more on our new Safeguards blog: https://safeguards.anthropic.com/2026/self-assessment/
在 X 查看被引用的帖子

来源:Rohan Paul · x.com