Cognition 在 FrontierCode 2.0 编码基准上评测了 Gemini 4 Carbon 和 Gemini 4 Argon。Gemini 4 Carbon 得分 40%，接近 SOTA，单任务成本 4.04 美元，落后于 Claude Opus 5.5、GPT-6 Astra 和 Claude Sonnet 5.5；Gemini 4 Argon 得分 26.3%，单任务成本 6.41 美元，领先 Muse Wonder 1.0，但落后于 Claude Haiku 5.5 和 Grok 4.7。作者转发该结果并评论称 Google 可能真的回来了。
Google might actually be back
【引用 @cognition】We've evaluated Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon on FrontierCode 2.0, our coding benchmark that measure's a model's ability to go beyond the spec.
Gemini 4 Carbon scores near SOTA with a score of 40% and a cost of $4.04 per task, behind Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Sonnet 5.5.
Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% with a cost of $6.41 per task, ahead of Muse Wonder 1.0, but behind Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7.
See the leaderboard with full scores: https://cognition.com/frontiercode
We've evaluated Gemini 4 Carbon and Gemini 4 Argon on FrontierCode 2.0, our coding benchmark that measure's a model's ability to go beyond the spec. Gemini 4 Carbon scores near SOTA with a score of 40% and a cost of $4.04 per task, behind Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Sonnet 5.5. Gemini 4 Argon scores 26.3% with a cost of $6.41 per task, ahead of Muse Wonder 1.0, but behind Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 4.7. See the leaderboard with full scores: https://cognition.com/frontiercode在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Lisan al Gaib · x.com