很高兴看到更多机构在探索这里的想法。我不认为蒸馏对美国AI竞争力有害是板上钉钉的事。
Glad to see more institutions exploring the ideas here. I don’t think it’s cut and dry that distillation is bad for the US’s AI competitiveness.
【引用 @ArchieHall】In praise of distillation. We (@kuhhbin) argue in @TheEconomist this week against efforts to ban Chinese models trained in part on American ones.
OpenAI and Anthropic may dislike distillation, but:
— Price competition is good for the ecosystem
— Paradoxically, distillation may be good for national security, both in propagating US developers' safeguards on cyber/bio risk to Chinese models, and in keeping China in fast-follower mode
— The US developers' own IP claims here are pretty flimsy, since distillation isn't all that different to the 'fair use' defense they're using for the training data they hoover up.
https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/10/29/let-china-copy-american-ai
In praise of distillation. We (@kuhhbin) argue in @TheEconomist this week against efforts to ban Chinese models trained in part on American ones. OpenAI and Anthropic may dislike distillation, but: — Price competition is good for the ecosystem — Paradoxically, distillation may be good for national security, both in propagating US developers' safeguards on cyber/bio risk to Chinese models, and in keeping China in fast-follower mode — The US developers' own IP claims here are pretty flimsy, since distillation isn't all that different to the 'fair use' defense they're using for the training data they hoover up. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2026/10/29/let-china-copy-american-ai在 X 查看被引用的帖子
来源：Nathan Lambert · x.com